Exhibit 31 of 172 WWII · 1942–1945

Navajo Code Talkers

A military code built from Navajo vocabulary and a spelling alphabet, developed and used by Navajo Marines.

Never publicly broken in wartime service; a historical military code.

PeopleAn estimated 375–420 Navajo Code Talkers, USMC
Year1942–1945
Key TypeMilitary vocabulary and spelling code built from Navajo
Broken ByNever publicly broken in wartime service
Modern LessonSpecialised shared code, training and operational context

Why This Matters

Navajo Code Talkers combined fluent speech with a memorised military vocabulary and spelling alphabet. Their speed and effectiveness depended on training as well as a language unfamiliar to most enemy listeners.

In the public record, this system was never publicly broken by cryptanalysis in wartime service. That historical record does not establish security today; this obsolete system is presented for historical study.

Historical Context

This exhibit honors the Navajo Marines who served as Code Talkers during World War II. The National Archives estimates their number at 375–420. Their work depended on a designed military code, memorisation and communication skills; it remained classified until 1968.

Philip Johnston proposed using Navajo for Marine Corps communications in 1942. The programme developed a specialised code; ordinary fluency in Navajo alone was not equivalent to knowing all its military meanings.

Some of the original 29 code developers served in the later stages of the Guadalcanal campaign in 1942; the original training group should not be equated with a single deployment. The Navajo Nation’s historical account quotes Major Howard Connor, 5th Marine Division signal officer at Iwo Jima: "Were it not for the Navajos, the Marines would never have taken Iwo Jima."

The programme was declassified in 1968. In 2001 the original 29 recruits were honoured with Congressional Gold Medals; later Navajo Code Talkers received silver medals.

How It Works

The code assigned specialised Navajo terms to military concepts. Operators memorised it, but written dictionaries also existed: the Navy preserves a code-talker dictionary revised on 15 June 1945. The alphabet below can also be checked in the CIA’s reproduction of that dictionary’s alphabet section.

Military terms → Navajo words by meaning:

Fighter plane   = da-he-tih-hi    "hummingbird"
Bomber          = jay-sho         "buzzard"
Submarine       = besh-lo         "iron fish"
Destroyer       = ca-lo           "shark"
Battleship      = lo-tso          "whale"
General         = bih-keh-he      "war chief"
Colonel         = atsah-besh-le-gai "silver eagle"
America         = ne-he-mah       "our mother"

For words or names not assigned a codebook entry — a phonetic alphabet was used, each letter sent as a Navajo word whose English meaning began with that letter:

Phonetic alphabet:
A = WOL-LA-CHEE (ant)
G = KLIZZIE (goat)
I = TKIN (ice)
M = TSIN-TLITI (match)
O = A-KHA (oil)
U = SHI-DA (uncle)
W = GLOE-IH (weasel)

"IWO" = TKIN, GLOE-IH, A-KHA

(Words already in the codebook were sent whole:
"attack" = AL-TAH-JE-JAY)
Wartime Performance and Limits
🛡️

No successful Japanese cryptanalytic break is established in the cited wartime record. That is a historical operational result, not proof of mathematical secrecy.

Several practical obstacles confronted an interceptor:

  • Navajo was unfamiliar to most Japanese analysts; this does not mean it had no writing, grammar or dictionaries.
  • The specialised military meanings and spelling alphabet had to be learned in addition to the language.
  • Fluent speakers could transmit and interpret the code quickly in difficult field conditions.
  • Training and disciplined use supported the system; unfamiliarity alone is not a modern security guarantee.
What It Teaches Modern Cryptography
Concept from Navajo CodeModern Evolution
Security through linguistic complexitySecurity through mathematical complexity — modern encryption must withstand analysis even when its algorithm is known
Shared knowledge as the keyPre-shared keys (PSK): both parties must possess the same secret before communication
Memorised code vocabularyPre-shared secrets require a protected distribution process; public-key methods offer a different way to establish keys
Historical secrecy and later publicationPublication of a historical code does not imply forward secrecy, which is a separate property of modern key establishment
Can You Break This?

A short Navajo Code message. Use what you just learned.

KLIZZIE SHI-DA WOL-LA-CHEE TSIN-TLITI

Hint: Each Navajo word = one letter. A=ant, G=goat, M=match, U=uncle

G U A M
Historical Performance

No measured percentage can express this code’s resistance to attack. The wartime record should be considered alongside training, available personnel, vocabulary consistency and the adversary’s access.

Quick Facts
Exhibit31 of 172
EraWWII · 1942–1945
TrustHistorical Only
PeopleAn estimated 375–420 Navajo Code Talkers
Year1942–1945
Wartime recordNo publicly documented cryptanalytic break
Beyond Navajo: Other Code Talker Programs

The US military also used other Indigenous-language code systems:

  • Choctaw (WWI): Choctaw soldiers used their language for US Army communications in France.
  • Comanche (WWII): The programme initially recruited 17 men. Comanche Code Talkers served with the 4th Infantry Division in Europe; not all 17 recruits served with that division in combat.
  • Hopi (WWII): Hopi servicemen also worked as code talkers in the Pacific.
🧭

The Library of Congress Veterans History Project preserves first-person accounts. The National Archives article “Semper Fidelis, Code Talkers” (2001) documents the code’s development and operational limitations. Historical effectiveness should not be replaced with a numerical security score.

← Previous Hagelin C-36 / C-52