Exhibit 165 of 167German field cipher · 1944

Rasterschlüssel 44 (RS44)

An irregular writing stencil, a precise starting cell, and a keyed column readout

Published Allied attacks used captured stencils, retransmissions and probable plaintext; isolated traffic could remain difficult.

OriginGerman armed forces
FamilyDisrupted transposition
Key TypeDaily stencil, column ranks, starting cell and minute
Modern LessonA large settings count is not evidence of security
Try the documented procedure

Fixed original-manual stencil and column ranks. Prepare the German field message yourself. The interface uppercases, strips accents and discards non-A–Z characters; it does not encode names, spell out numbers, or add Wahlwörter.

Complete result

Animation: extracted or reconstructed so far

Step, Play/Pause and Reset keep keyboard focus on the control. With reduced motion enabled, Play shows the completed arrangement immediately.

Why This Matters

A large settings count is not evidence of security. Following a complete original example makes conventions observable: a changed boundary, pairing rule or final cell changes the ciphertext.

Historical Context

The Rasterschlüssel 44 was a German paper-and-pencil field cipher intended to replace Double Playfair in 1944. This exhibit follows Schlüsselanleitung zum Rasterschlüssel 44, Ausgabe 27. März 1944, with the second addendum’s clarification of the beginning boundary and column counting. It does not implement the October 1944 change to a directly selected readout column.

A daily key supplied the black-and-white stencil, permuted column ranks, coordinate labels, name alphabets and indicator substitution. Operators wrote on thin grid paper over the stencil. A planned 1 August introduction appears in contemporary Allied reports; actual adoption varied across services and units.

Exact Procedure
  1. Select an indicated beginning row and physical column. If their intersection is black, advance in row order to the next white cell. Include the beginning itself when it is white.
  2. Enter prepared plaintext left to right through white cells only. Continue through successive rows, wrapping from the bottom to the top if necessary. The stencil has 24 × 25 cells, with exactly ten writing cells in each row: 240 available cells.
  3. Add the digits of the tactical-time minute and message length. From the indicated beginning column, move that many physical columns to the right, wrapping at column 25. The first step excludes the beginning column; returning to it after a full circuit counts normally.
  4. Read the occupied cells top to bottom in the selected column, then by ascending numerical column rank, cycling from 25 to 1. Skip every unoccupied cell, including an unused gap when the message wraps.
  5. For decryption, mark the same occupied cells from the length and starting position. Fill them in that column order, then read in the original writing order.

The transmitted body was 60–200 letters, leaving at least 40 white cells unused. Shorter messages required operator-chosen Wahlwörter, with doubled boundary letters. Longer messages were divided into separately keyed parts of differing lengths. The teaching mode permits shorter bodies without silently adding fillers.

Original Manual Example

Printed pp. 12–13 and Fig. 2 on p. 18 give a complete 77-letter example. Beginning: row ae (5), column bb (14); tactical time 1203. The digit sum is 0 + 3 + 7 + 7 = 17, so readout begins in physical column ee (6), rank 19.

Prepared plaintext:
FEINDGREIFTSEITELFXVIERFUENFUHRBEIAAIGQALFISIGQALFISEEMITAQTPANZNAQSUEDWESTAN

Ciphertext body:
DIANMRQTVFNNRISIFFGPUEFZGNAEEHAEUTAIIEADAGQQLWIBSFFXUTITEEAAENIQSSIRLIEFESELT

The test suite also reproduces the 64-letter wrap example on printed pp. 14–15 and Fig. 4, p. 20. These expected ciphertexts were transcribed from the manual, not generated by the new engine.

Cryptanalysis and Limits

Captain Walter J. Fried’s reports document Allied work during 1944. Report F-79 (22 August) describes fitting messages to a captured stencil. F-93 (18 September) reports recovering stencil rows from retransmissions and messages sent twice from the same starting point, then exploiting stereotyped traffic and cribs. It also describes constructing 36 sliding masks to test probable plaintext against known column order.

These are conditional attacks, not a claim that every isolated message was solved. Captured material, repeated arrangements and operator habits mattered. The daily stencil and 25-column permutation create many possible settings, but counting them as “bits of security” ignores their structure and the traffic available to an attacker. Letter frequencies are preserved.

Reconstruction and Teaching Limits

The default stencil and ranks are factual transcriptions of the manual’s worked key. You can vary the beginning and minute; the engine also accepts a validated custom stencil and rank permutation. This page fixes the daily stencil so the published answer stays reproducible.

The demo accepts prepared A–Z text. It does not reproduce German preprocessing (CH/CK → Q, ß → SZ, umlauts written out, number words), place-name substitution, encoded message headers, key distribution, coordinate-use marks, emergency procedures or operator-chosen filler words. Accent stripping is a museum input convenience and is not historical German message preparation. No padding or escape scheme is added.

Quick Facts
Exhibit165 of 167
OriginGerman armed forces
FamilyDisrupted transposition
KeyDaily stencil, column ranks, starting cell and minute
Sources and Further Reading

Original RS44 manual: edition 27 March 1944; §§7–40, printed pp. 3–14; worked-key figures pp. 17–20; second addendum in the scan.

Captain W. J. Fried’s contemporary reports: F-79 (22 August 1944), F-93 (18 September 1944), pp. 1–2. Facsimiles curated by Frode Weierud at CryptoCellar.

The diagrams here are drawn by this site’s renderer. No archival scans or third-party images are reproduced.

← PreviousColumnar Transposition